DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7O1 5. COURTHOVEL ROAD, SUITF 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
pocket No: NR&485-14
91 Auanst 2014
orrection of your naval
0 of the United States
Your previous Case, docket mumber NR2069-13,
you now seek the same relief you requested
lication for c
This is in
record pursuant to th
Code, section 1552.
was Genied on 15 May 2014.
in your previous case.
zB three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records,
‘dered your application on
sitting in executive session, recons1
21 August 2014. of error and injustice were
reviewed in accor istrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board's
file on your prior case, and applicable statutes, regulations and
dered the advisory opinions
d 9 and 1’
policies. In addition, the Board consi
furnished by the Navy personnel Command dated 7 May an
hich are attached. The
y 2014 with attachments
December 2013 and 10 January 2914, copies of Ww
Board also considered your 1etters dated 8 Jul
and 8 August 2014.
and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
ubmitted was ansufficient to
a that the evidence S
obable material error or injustice. in
tantially concurred with the advisory
opinions dated 7 May and 9 and 17 December 2013. Since the Board
found insufficient basis to grant relief regarding your detachment
tor cause or fitness reports, it had no grounds for favorable action
on any of your other requests.
After careful
the Board foun
establish the existence of pr
this connection, the Board subs
voted to deny relief. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Tet Cnt og
ROBERT D 45ALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5203 14
d applicable statutes, the Board considered the rformance Evaluation . a copy of which is Lentious consideration of the entire After careful and cons i ce submitted was f probable material the Board substantially he report of the PERB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05607-08
DEPARTMENT BOARD FOR CORRECTION 2 NAVY A WASHINGTON DC This is in reference the applicati mMaval record pursuant to the provi | | IA three-member panel of the Board Records, sitting in executive/ sess application on 24 November 2008. injustice were reviewed in ac¢orda regulations and procedures applica Board. Documentary material ¢onsi regulations and policies. your ¥ 1 t After careful and conscientious c record, the Board found that the insufficient to establish the exi error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR621 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and pclicies. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence o= PTSD in your case .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06607-05
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Thestatementof2sjuly2 006 from a chief petty officer who says he was the physical fitness assessment coordinator at the pertinent time did not persuade the Board either, as it was submitted two years after the fact; and it did not affirmatively state you passed the PRT The Board Particular...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6975 13
Your previous case, docket number 08435-10, was denied on 4 November 2010. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8308 14
However, you allege that you did not receive a copy of the partially favorable advisory opinion (2/0), since you did not agree with the approval dates. As explained in the Board’s previous partial approval letter, a case may only be reconsidered upon submission of new and material evidence. On 14 July 2014, your reconsideration request was approved.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1346 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 May 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05450-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2008. That board found that there was insufficient evidence to show any error or injustice in the discharge examination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2069 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4717 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2014. in addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Boarg (PERB) dated 17 May 2013, the e-mail from HOMC dated 18 July 2013, and the advisory opinions furnished by HOMC dated 18 February 2014 with attachment (MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Subject: Promotion Recommendation...